These research notes are provided as-is and contain supplementary working research.
Finding
Earsham testator and his minor son are both the wrong generation to be the emigrant
The Earsham testator died in 1638 and his son John was still a minor at that date (born after about 1624), so neither man is the Massachusetts emigrant, who was already at Weymouth by June 1641 and had married his own wife Mary well before 1628. What the will documents instead is a previously unlogged Waveney-valley Gurney yeoman family, distinctive enough -- the rare brother's forename, a dead brother's four named sons -- to recognize and set aside wherever it resurfaces. This family's own further history, traced forward through a 1710 Bungay nuncupative will, a 1690s Bungay merchant's will naming Sarah Gurney's children, and an eighteenth-century Earsham manorial court book, is carried on its own dedicated subject file rather than in this graph.
Why this conclusion
- Synthesizes Analysis The elimination scaffold: structural grounds, not a blanket same-surname suspicionAn instance of the family-status-and-chronology elimination ground: the right surname, the wrong generation.
- Depends on Evidence 1638 Earsham will: testator, wife Mary, son John a minor at fourteen, brother Syon/LyonThe elimination rests directly on the will's own stated family-status facts.
- Synthesized by Finding Other named households and the wider sweep hold ~8% combined residual; Candidate B remains the sole survivorEarsham is one of the eliminations this synthesis draws together.
Topic file location: Identity — Other Eliminations and Earsham
Technical details
- Research item:
G13-RI-000115 - Graph revision:
244 - Machine-readable JSON:
/assets/g13-graph/findings/G13-RI-000115.json
This is one research item from the John Gurney research graph; the fuller narrative treatment is in the linked topic above and the research library.